|
Here is the agenda for the CC meeting on Tuesday: https://longmont.primegov.com/Portal/Meeting?meetingTemplateId=16358 For those of us living outside the city limits, if you want to speak, you can do so at the end of the meeting at the second public invited to be heard segment. I can also give you a prepared statement if you wish. (I have 2 folks who have offered to do this, thus far. THANK YOU!) ________ Landing fees / The rates and charges study - a redux online read this page for a redux on why landing fees make sense: https://klmo.airfieldeconomics.org/the-airport-is-in-trouble.html –––––––– In other news: in a stunning display of, er, chaos (?), misinformation (?), incompetence (?) CoBoulder CC voted to keep taking FAA grants last week, which binds them in keeping the airport open in perpetuity. Read more: https://boulderreportinglab.org/2026/07/23/boulder-city-councilmember-mark-wallach-resigns-after-vote-to-keep-municipal-airport-open-indefinitely/ It's really important to remember and to know: the airport issue is multifaceted. Learning all the pieces of the larger issue is like drinking from a firehose. However, There are 2 main issues on the table right now:
Thing 1: getting the airport financially sustainable, and Thing 2: dealing with the nuisance the city has the power to take care of both items. Landing fees takes care of Thing 1. And, landing fees could take the place of FAA grants if the city chose to do so. And, if the city chose to be free of the FAA grants, it could have much more control over it's airport. Re: Thing 2, there are many ways the city can tackle this, and there are other airports that have done this well, like Naples Airport in FL.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Archives
August 2026
Categories |
RSS Feed